HP Z640 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	87.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP Z640 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 212A
Memory	27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150402
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Jun 14 '18 at 11:40
Run Duration	230 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 1,838 User benchmarks, average bench 69% CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	75.2% Very good	Memory 88.2 1-Core 88 2-Core 183 70% 120 Pts	4-Core 335 8-Core 619 57% 477 Pts	64-Core 824 51% 824 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2000 13,526 User benchmarks, average bench 7% HP(103C 094C) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 353.30 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 7% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAK256TBN-1AR15ABHA 256GB 521 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 193GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0T13 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 126 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 37 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 8 (AE) Unknown 100 100 19 (B0) Unknown 100 100 1941 (B5) Unknown 100 100 889065635934 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 37 (C2) HDA temperature 62 56 188979740710 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 53568627 (F1) Unknown 100 100 1705419703 (F2) Unknown 100 100 4067768327 (F3) Unknown 100 100 82912712	87.3% Excellent	Read 484 Write 481 Mixed 487 108% 484 MB/s	4K Read 18.4 4K Write 68.9 4K Mixed 27.4 100% 38.2 MB/s	DQ Read 189 DQ Write 166 DQ Mixed 55.5 75% 137 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 87.3% Great: 93%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40 97,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 929GB free Firmware: A3FF Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 135 135 99 (03) Spinup time 122 122 25789923643 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 445 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 138 138 31 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 24826 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 277 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 514 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 514 (C2) HDA temperature 177 177 197569806367 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	77.4% Very good	Read 132 Write 138 Mixed 125 99% 132 MB/s	4K Read 0.76 4K Write 1.45 4K Mixed 0.39 102% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 77.4% Great: 74%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA200 2TB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1.5TB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	51.6% Above average	Read 125 Write 126 Mixed 79.9 138% 110 MB/s	4K Read 1.09 4K Write 1.92 4K Mixed 0.18 76% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 52%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA200 2TB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1TB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	51.4% Above average	Read 125 Write 126 Mixed 19 105% 89.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.04 4K Write 1.83 4K Mixed 0.18 72% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 52%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA200 2TB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 520GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	50.5% Above average	Read 123 Write 119 Mixed 75.5 132% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.94 4K Write 2.08 4K Mixed 0.21 81% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 50.5% Great: 52%
ST310005 28AS 1TB 41 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 308GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	36.4% Below average	Read 92 Write 86.9 Mixed 49.8 94% 76.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.81 4K Write 1.27 4K Mixed 0.47 62% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 18ASF1G72PZ-2G1A2 4x8GB 634 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (74^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	102% Outstanding	MC Read 45.8 MC Write 38.2 MC Mixed 35.6 114% 39.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 21 49% 17.3 GB/s	Latency 69.4 58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 116%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z640 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,592 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

System: HP Z640 Workstation

CPU
Xeon E5-2620 v3IntelBench 66%, 6,890 samples	113x
Xeon E5-1650 v3IntelBench 77%, 7,962 samples	101x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v31stBench 63%, 2,624 samples	97x

GPU
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	146x
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	115x
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples	62x

SSD
SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $69Bench 205%, 12,601 samples	50x
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 219%, 21,747 samples	33x
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 238%, 21,542 samples	33x

RAM
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 2x16GBSamsungBench 59%, 1,132 samples	45x
M393A1G40DB0-CPB 4x8GBSamsungBench 93%, 970 samples	38x
HMA42GR7AFR4N-TF 2x16GBHynixBench 61%, 375 samples	34x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 16% - Very poor

Total price: $509

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16