Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Jet ski	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Pavilion dm4 Notebook PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1651
Memory	2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20111116
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Mar 25 '16 at 19:07
Run Duration	166 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2430M-$53 41,461 User benchmarks, average bench 50% CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	40.7% Average	Memory 55.2 1-Core 20.7 2-Core 53.3 29% 43.1 Pts	4-Core 148 8-Core 177 21% 162 Pts	64-Core 179 11% 179 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 40.7% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6470M 4,805 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 1651) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.830.6.3000 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	2.24% Terrible	Lighting 3 Reflection 2.96 Parallax 2.22 2% 2.73 fps	MRender 2.33 Gravity 1.77 Splatting 2.52 2% 2.21 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.24% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra Plus 128GB-$75 16,709 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 5GB free (System drive) Firmware: X230 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 253 100 4980 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1069 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 18 (A8) Unknown 100 100 168 (A9) Unknown 100 100 149 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 70 (AE) Unknown 100 100 9 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 71 39 167504248861 (D4) Unknown 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 545 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 9190 (F1) Unknown 253 253 5795 (F2) Unknown 253 253 9045 (F3) Unknown 100 100 0	33.8% Below average	Read 308 Write 166 Mixed 199 50% 224 MB/s	4K Read 9.18 4K Write 18.1 4K Mixed 7.61 33% 11.6 MB/s	DQ Read 20.1 DQ Write 36.8 DQ Mixed 8.94 12% 21.9 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 91%
ST950032 5AS 500GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 286GB free, PID 7788 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	11.4% Very poor	Read 27.5 Write 22.3 Mixed 25.2 32% 25 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 0.81 4K Mixed 0.34 41% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.4% Great: 29%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya M2S4G64CB8HB5N-CG Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 8GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	45.9% Average	MC Read 16.8 MC Write 17.2 MC Mixed 15.8 47% 16.6 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 13.6 SC Mixed 14.1 38% 13.5 GB/s	Latency 142 28% 142 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	118x
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	86x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	68x

RAM
M471B5773CHS-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 29%, 8,570 samples	11x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	10x
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 25,458 samples	10x

Value: 49% - Average

Total price: $263

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16