Today's hottest deals

Asus P8Z68-V LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8Z68-V LE  (all builds)
Memory19 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130909
Uptime8.8 Days
Run DateMay 31 '18 at 05:36
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 23%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 88.9
1-Core 91.1
2-Core 172
70% 118 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 445
46% 368 Pts
64-Core 452
28% 452 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
32.7% Below average
Lighting 41.5
Reflection 31.5
Parallax 38.3
34% 37.1 fps
MRender 37.1
Gravity 38.2
Splatting 37
31% 37.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
63GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.8% Average
Read 230
Write 184
Mixed 189
45% 201 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 41.7
4K Mixed 18.7
87% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 35.1
DQ Write 70
DQ Mixed 20.4
25% 41.8 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
27GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 332
Write 184
Mixed 277
58% 264 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 55.4
4K Mixed 18.6
98% 34.6 MB/s
DQ Read 31.8
DQ Write 89.4
DQ Mixed 18.4
26% 46.5 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 134%
Seagate ST12000NE0007-2GT116 12TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: EN01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 191
Write 187
Mixed 144
130% 174 MB/s
4K Read 2.36
4K Write 2.44
4K Mixed 0.43
191% 1.74 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 109%
Great: 109%
Seagate ST12000NE0007-2GT116 12TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: EN01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 6% Great: 109%
WD4000FYYX 4TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 00.0D1K4 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Read 156
Write 159
Mixed 125
110% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.94
4K Write 2.84
4K Mixed 0.4
136% 1.39 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown IMT41GU6MFR8W-TA2 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
53.1% Above average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 17
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 17.5
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z68-V LE Builds (Compare 619 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V LE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $463
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback