PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 3.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | HP EliteBook 8730w (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 30EC |
Memory | 1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20101203 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | May 26 '18 at 15:26 |
Run Duration | 153 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 32% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
35.4%
Below average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro FX 2700M
HP(103C 30EC) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 276.21
|
3.32%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
36.9%
Below average
|
||||
13.7%
Very poor
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
|
13.5%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Duo T9600Intel $170Bench 39%, 2,726 samples | 14x |
Core2 Duo T9400Intel $55Bench 39%, 3,295 samples | 7x |
Core2 Duo P8600Intel $42Bench 37%, 8,502 samples | 5x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro FX 2700MNvidiaBench 3%, 788 samples | 23x |
Mobility Radeon HD 3670ATIBench 2%, 405 samples | 13x |
Quadro FX 3700MNvidiaBench 6%, 383 samples | 3x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 34% - Below average | Total price: $230 |