bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
SystemVMware, VMware7,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171027
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 24 '18 at 20:37
Run Duration96 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Core i5-6300HQ
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
62.7% Good
Memory 64.7
1-Core 88.2
2-Core 175
61% 109 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 353
47% 352 Pts
64-Core 351
22% 351 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Vmware SVGA 3D
Vmware(15AD 0405) 1GB
Driver: vm3dum64_loader.dll Ver. 8.15.1.60
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
3.37% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 0.85
Parallax 5.34
2% 2.8 fps
MRender 6.76
Gravity 4.43
Splatting 11
6% 7.41 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.37%
Great: 69%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware, VMware Virtual S 75GB
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
36.8% Below average
Read 57
Write 71.1
Mixed 61.3
48% 63.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.33
4K Mixed 0.19
67% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-4096MB 1x4GB
1 of 128 slots used
4GB DIMM DRAM
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
38.6% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 12.3
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 12.4
33% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,532 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback