Dell Precision WorkStation 670

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 11%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 8.34%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics3.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemDell Precision WorkStation 670  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0XC837
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20060315
Uptime6.2 Days
Run DateMay 18 '18 at 13:10
Run Duration629 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon 2.80GHz
Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
8.34% Terrible
Memory 14.2
1-Core 10.4
2-Core 13.1
9% 12.6 Pts
4-Core 14.2
8-Core 19.3
2% 16.8 Pts
64-Core 22.3
1% 22.3 Pts
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.34%
Great: 30%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
MSI(1462 8A90) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.1
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
3.38% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 4.92
Parallax 1.28
4% 3.5 fps
MRender 4.48
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 3.17
3% 3.95 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.38%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HMS5C4040ALE640 4TB
285GB free
Firmware: MPAOA580 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 100
Write 83.1
Mixed 3.98
45% 62.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.49
4K Mixed 0.15
62% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 72%
WD WD800GD-75FLC3 80GB
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 32.08G32 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
30.5% Below average
Read 47.4
Write 58.5
Mixed 45.8
38% 50.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.74
4K Mixed 0.44
102% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 39%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 8TB
5TB free, PID ab34
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
24.4% Poor
Read 26.6
Write 22.5
Mixed 22.1
30% 23.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 5.04
4K Mixed 0.48
191% 2.14 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 85%
Patriot Memory 124GB
115GB free, PID 4200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.04% Terrible
Read 10.7
Write 2.51
Mixed 3.5
6% 5.56 MB/s
4K Read 3.95
4K Write 0.005
4K Mixed 0.005
15% 1.32 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.04%
Great: 3%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 6 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
8.06% Terrible
MC Read 3.3
MC Write 3.1
MC Mixed 2.6
9% 3 GB/s
SC Read 0.8
SC Write 1.5
SC Mixed 0.8
3% 1.03 GB/s
Latency 366
11% 366 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 8.06%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback