Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	5.69% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	79.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 X 940-$150 592 User benchmarks, average bench 60% None, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	40.5% Average	Memory 67.2 1-Core 23.2 2-Core 44.9 33% 45.1 Pts	4-Core 77.8 8-Core 116 12% 96.9 Pts	64-Core 123 8% 123 Pts
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 2800M 1,135 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Legend(17AA 214F) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.92 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	5.69% Terrible	Lighting 7.5 Reflection 8.12 Parallax 2.38 6% 6 fps	MRender 7.14 Gravity 5.4 Splatting 5.52 5% 6.02 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.69% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Windows_OS 2TB 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. Max speed: Unknown Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	79.3% Very good	Read 540 Write 472 Mixed 518 114% 510 MB/s	4K Read 18.3 4K Write 23.4 4K Mixed 22.5 69% 21.4 MB/s	DQ Read 191 DQ Write 126 DQ Mixed 73 78% 130 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 4x4GB 427 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 1334 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	34.5% Below average	MC Read 13.5 MC Write 12.5 MC Mixed 12.4 37% 12.8 GB/s	SC Read 5.4 SC Write 5.4 SC Mixed 7.4 17% 6.07 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM