Performance Results


Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 6% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	9.68% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	The RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

6 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom Z3735G 1,051 User benchmarks, average bench 33% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.35 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	23.3% Poor	Memory 40.6 1-Core 14.1 2-Core 22.4 19% 25.7 Pts	4-Core 34 8-Core 50.5 5% 42.2 Pts	64-Core 40.6 2% 40.6 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 23.3% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 7270) 514MB Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	0.54% Terrible	Lighting 0.63 Reflection 0.69 Parallax 0.75 0% 0.69 fps	MRender 0.95 Gravity 0.63 Splatting 0.65 1% 0.75 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.54% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba 032GE4 31GB 295 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 6GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0.0 Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	9.68% Terrible	Read 108 Write 35.5 Mixed 42.8 14% 62.3 MB/s	4K Read 5.85 4K Write 0.44 4K Mixed 1.55 11% 2.62 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 9.68% Great: 26%
Generic SL32G SD Card 32GB 261 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 29GB free Firmware: 8.0 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	10.6% Very poor	Read 22.5 Write 12.2 Mixed 20.4 14% 18.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.69 4K Write 2.48 4K Mixed 1.55 413% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 10.6% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
To be filled by O.E.M be filled by O.E.M 1x1GB 577 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 1 of 2 slots used 1GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	6.81% Terrible	MC Read 2.3 MC Write 3.2 MC Mixed 1.4 7% 2.3 GB/s	SC Read 0.2 SC Write 0.3 SC Mixed 0.3 1% 0.27 GB/s	Latency 200 20% 200 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 6.81% Great: 20%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM