Dell XPS 8300

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemDell XPS 8300  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0Y2MRG
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111017
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 04 '18 at 02:27
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$83
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Memory 91.3
1-Core 96.1
2-Core 188
74% 125 Pts
4-Core 319
8-Core 470
49% 394 Pts
64-Core 471
29% 471 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
PNY(196E 1117) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 267 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.69
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.14% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 4.65
Parallax 3.41
3% 3.99 fps
MRender 4.29
Gravity 4.1
Splatting 3.09
3% 3.82 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.14%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
626GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC4A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 106
Write 91.6
Mixed 104
76% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.28
4K Mixed 0.5
99% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 68%
Generic- SD/MMC 64GB
58GB free, PID 9106
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Read 18.9
Write 18.1
Mixed 16.7
23% 17.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.06
4K Write 2.83
4K Mixed 1.36
158% 2.75 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT51264BD160BJ.M8F 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.3% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 15
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 14.8
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 65.3
61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical XPS 8300 Builds (Compare 1,752 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Dell XPS 8300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $222
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback