Fujitsu CELSIUS R930power

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics12.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive46.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS R930power  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3118-A2
Memory29.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140605
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 19 '18 at 11:12
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
50% Average
Memory 50.3
1-Core 70.2
2-Core 137
48% 85.7 Pts
4-Core 267
8-Core 431
43% 349 Pts
64-Core 999
62% 999 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 50%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000
Nvidia(10DE 097C) 3GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 391.33
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Lighting 14.7
Reflection 13.7
Parallax 18.1
12% 15.5 fps
MRender 20.1
Gravity 17.7
Splatting 16.3
14% 18 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 487GB
429GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Read 475
Write 492
Mixed 457
106% 475 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 34.4
4K Mixed 20.8
68% 23.5 MB/s
DQ Read 139
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 66.6
75% 126 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 214%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 487GB
399GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Read 435
Write 491
Mixed 446
102% 457 MB/s
4K Read 14.6
4K Write 34.5
4K Mixed 20.7
67% 23.3 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 65.9
76% 128 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 214%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 122GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 407
Write 90.9
Mixed 148
46% 215 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 31
4K Mixed 15.4
59% 20.4 MB/s
DQ Read 206
DQ Write 109
DQ Mixed 28.5
56% 115 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 105%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 950GB
239GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Read 170
Write 111
Mixed 120
100% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 1.21
4K Mixed 0.2
70% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 142%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
51GB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
58% Above average
Read 96.8
Write 105
Mixed 97.6
75% 99.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 2.33
4K Mixed 0.37
110% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 58%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1G73QH0- 4x8GB
4 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
40.1% Average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 14.2
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 6
21% 7.37 GB/s
Latency 160
25% 160 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS R930power Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS R930power

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 9% - Terrible Total price: $1,313
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback