Atcomputers M22ES

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, GPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory0.5GB is enough RAM for Windows XP.
OS VersionWindows XP is considerably out of date. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10. (Note: an additional 0.5GB of RAM is recommended prior to upgrading.)
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAtcomputers M22ES  (all builds)
MotherboardClevo M22ES
Memory0.2 GB free of 0.5 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows XP
BIOS Date20030429
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 10 '14 at 08:19
Run Duration81 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 2.40GHz
U23, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
1-Core 27
2-Core 27
14% 27 Pts
4-Core 27
8-Core 27.2
4% 27.1 Pts
64-Core 27.7
2% 27.7 Pts
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD600VE-75HDT1 60GB
46GB free (System drive)
Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Read 30.5
Write 30.8
Mixed 16.7
19% 26 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.18
4K Mixed 0.33
79% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 18%
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback