Acer Veriton T/M/S661;461

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics9.08% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive44.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Veriton T/M/S661;461  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer EQ35M
Memory4.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080724
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateMar 28 '18 at 10:54
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel XeonE5-1660
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.2% Average
Memory 72.1
1-Core 27.6
2-Core 54.8
36% 51.5 Pts
4-Core 109
8-Core 109
15% 109 Pts
64-Core 111
7% 111 Pts
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Gainward(10B0 0FC6) 2GB
CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.1
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
9.08% Terrible
Lighting 10.2
Reflection 9.35
Parallax 11.9
8% 10.5 fps
MRender 13.7
Gravity 12.1
Splatting 13.1
11% 13 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.08%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso Sata III 127GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0303B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.3% Average
Read 261
Write 151
Mixed 191
44% 201 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 43.5
4K Mixed 15
78% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 23.4
DQ Write 43.1
DQ Mixed 15.3
17% 27.3 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 89%
Seagate ST3250312AS 250GB-$59
98GB free
Firmware: JC66 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 89.8
Write 103
Mixed 96.1
73% 96.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.35
81% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
2048, 1024, 2048, 1024 MB
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
17% Very poor
MC Read 6.6
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 4.5
15% 5.17 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 4.9
14% 4.83 GB/s
Latency 96.7
41% 96.7 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Veriton T/M/S661;461 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton T/M/S661;461

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $165
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback