Today's hottest deals

Matsushita CF-19FJGAXAM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive13% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMatsushita CF-19FJGAXAM  (all builds)
MotherboardMatsushita CF19-2
Memory1.9 GB free of 4.00098 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080619
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '18 at 15:57
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 68%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo U7500
IC1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.05 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
31.6% Below average
Memory 59.5
1-Core 12.7
2-Core 22.5
25% 31.6 Pts
4-Core 24.4
8-Core 24.2
3% 24.3 Pts
64-Core 24.5
2% 24.5 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 32%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Mobile Intel 965 Express Chipset Family
Device(10F7 8338) 384MB
Driver: igdumdx32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.1930
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 0.23
Reflection 0.12
Parallax 0.25
0% 0.2 fps
Gravity 0.27
Splatting 0.3
0% 0.29 fps
Poor: 0% Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$30
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32080RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
13% Very poor
Read 52.7
Write 33.2
Mixed 49
10% 45 MB/s
4K Read 7.23
4K Write 14.7
4K Mixed 5.27
26% 9.06 MB/s
DQ Read 35.2
DQ Write 20.3
DQ Mixed 11
13% 22.2 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 13%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 37GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 33792 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
8.73% Terrible
MC Read 2.8
MC Write 2
MC Mixed 2.5
7% 2.43 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 1.7
SC Mixed 1.4
6% 1.93 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.73%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback