Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 45% Speed boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	77.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1603 v4 257 User benchmarks, average bench 70% LGA2011-3 SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	47.9% Average	Memory 58.4 1-Core 53.6 2-Core 94.6 42% 68.9 Pts	4-Core 216 8-Core 222 29% 219 Pts	64-Core 332 20% 332 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K420 3,707 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Nvidia(10DE 1162) 2GB CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	3.98% Terrible	Lighting 4.33 Reflection 4.08 Parallax 4.47 4% 4.29 fps	MRender 5.14 Gravity 5.1 Splatting 7.04 5% 5.76 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.98% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TY256HDHP-000L1 256GB 2,045 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 99GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT04L0Q Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	77.2% Very good	Read 513 Write 487 Mixed 491 111% 497 MB/s	4K Read 18.7 4K Write 30.8 4K Mixed 16.4 66% 21.9 MB/s	DQ Read 185 DQ Write 131 DQ Mixed 44 64% 120 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A2G40EB1-CRC 1x16GB 61 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	34.2% Below average	MC Read 12.6 MC Write 12.9 MC Mixed 12.1 36% 12.5 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 9.2 SC Mixed 7.5 22% 7.87 GB/s	Latency 132 30% 132 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 34.2% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
Xeon E5-1603 v4IntelBench 70%, 257 samples	1x

GPU
Quadro K420NvidiaBench 3%, 3,707 samples	1x

SSD
MZ7TY256HDHP-000L1 256GBSamsungBench 90%, 2,045 samples	1x

RAM
M393A2G40EB1-CRC 1x16GBSamsungBench 38%, 61 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16