Asus Z170-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU, HDD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive54.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus Z170-E  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170630
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '18 at 15:21
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i5-6500-$211
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
SC Int 102
SC Float 109
SC Mixed 106
85% 106 Pts
QC Int 410
QC Float 437
QC Mixed 422
96% 423 Pts
MC Int 412
MC Float 438
MC Mixed 423
64% 424 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 79%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$65
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Read 369
Write 109
Mixed 153
46% 210 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 88
4K Mixed 11.2
100% 41.7 MB/s
DQ Read 93.7
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 30.1
44% 80.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 74%
Kingston SNS4151S316GD 16GB
4GB free
Firmware: S9FM01.6 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
37.1% Below average
Read 248
Write 45.1
Mixed 36.5
23% 110 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 33.8
4K Mixed 2.66
76% 24.1 MB/s
DQ Read 139
DQ Write 40.8
DQ Mixed 2.36
24% 60.6 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2187 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
41.1% Average
MC Read 15
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 11.3
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 12
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 41%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Z170-E Builds (Compare 2,574 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus Z170-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $821
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $358Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $78
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $155Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $249Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $120
Intel Core i7-7700K $355AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $147SanDisk Extreme 64GB $42
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $145SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback