Vizio CT14T-B0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVizio CT14T-B0  (all builds)
MotherboardQuanta VZ7A
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130131
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateJan 29 '16 at 17:14
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-4657M APU
CPU_1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.4% Average
Memory 59.9
1-Core 38.6
2-Core 71
37% 56.5 Pts
4-Core 124
8-Core 124
16% 124 Pts
64-Core 124
8% 124 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7660G
Quanta(152D 1036) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
2.24% Terrible
Lighting 2.73
Reflection 3.42
Parallax 2.94
2% 3.03 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 2.63
Splatting 3.35
2% 2.66 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.24%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNW128GMCP 128GB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: L0913A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
26.8% Poor
Read 225
Write 142
Mixed 178
40% 181 MB/s
4K Read 11.5
4K Write 8.68
4K Mixed 3.77
27% 8 MB/s
DQ Read 57.1
DQ Write 10.1
DQ Mixed 3.41
10% 23.6 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6MFR8C-PB 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 256 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.6% Very poor
MC Read 4.5
MC Write 2.5
MC Mixed 4
10% 3.67 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 4.3
12% 4.2 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback