Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	33.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	348% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 8600G-$170 107 User benchmarks, average bench 92% AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 4.35 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	74.9% Very good	Memory 39.9 1-Core 185 2-Core 363 96% 196 Pts	4-Core 586 8-Core 1,082 100% 834 Pts	64-Core 1,280 79% 1,280 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 110%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon 760M 57 User benchmarks, average bench 26% AMD(1002 15BF) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 24.10.1 Performing below potential (71^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	33.9% Below average	Lighting 37.5 Reflection 18.4 Parallax 61.7 31% 39.2 fps	MRender 17.6 Gravity 54.3 Splatting 66.9 40% 46.3 fps
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 39%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kioxia-exceria PLUS G3 SSD 2TB 160 User benchmarks, average bench 414% 876GB free (System drive) Firmware: ELFA01.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 3236 3502 3034 1829 1308 1281 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	348% Outstanding	Read 2,163 Write 2,818 Mixed 1,932 SusWrite 2,365 525% 2,319 MB/s	4K Read 32.8 4K Write 135 4K Mixed 49.8 185% 72.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1,528 DQ Write 1,180 DQ Mixed 1,312 993% 1,340 MB/s
Poor: 251% ↑ This bench: 348% Great: 511%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G52C42S5.M4G1 2x8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 119% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5200 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	121% Outstanding	MC Read 54.6 MC Write 47.1 MC Mixed 41.2 136% 47.6 GB/s	SC Read 20.2 SC Write 25.7 SC Mixed 23.4 66% 23.1 GB/s	Latency 134 30% 134 ns
Poor: 117% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 121%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	368	48	60	23.8"	1280 720	AUS2463 PA247CV

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM