Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 10SQ002LUK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive67.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
18 days ago, 7 days ago.
SystemLenovo 10SQ002LUK  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 312A
Memory7.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240410
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 31 '24 at 12:39
Run Duration303 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$135
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Memory 80.2
1-Core 128
2-Core 255
85% 154 Pts
4-Core 489
8-Core 800
79% 644 Pts
64-Core 813
50% 813 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9TB8W256G1001 256GB
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6106101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 188 190 182 188 188 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 451
Write 312
Mixed 220
SusWrite 189
65% 293 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 29.5
4K Mixed 24.7
89% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 352
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 137
126% 200 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 97%
WD Red Pro 6TB (2015)-$239
207GB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 125 119 109 110 151 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Read 185
Write 195
Mixed 75.7
SusWrite 123
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.9
191% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 122%
Rsh-319 ASM1153E 12TB
4TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 225 239 227 229 230 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 196
Write 189
Mixed 75.5
SusWrite 229
126% 172 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 122%
Great: 122%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 10TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 175 171 169 175 176 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 189
Write 190
Mixed 112
SusWrite 173
122% 166 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 1.7
390% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 104%
Great: 115%
SABRENT 2TB
211GB free
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 337 344 342 346 342 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 106%
Sabrent Dual SATA Bridge 4TB
44GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 68 67 68 94 112 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
50% Above average
Read 94.5
Write 92.6
Mixed 72.6
SusWrite 79.5
63% 84.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 50%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 0702 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.7% Good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 25.2
MC Mixed 20
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 21.7
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 54 32 0" 1280 720
Typical 10SQ002LUK Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10SQ002LUK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $135
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback