Today's hottest deals

Asrock Z590 Extreme WiFi 6E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 147%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics149% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive275% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock Z590 Extreme WiFi 6E  (all builds)
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210409
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 23 '24 at 08:42
Run Duration251 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11700K-$240
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Memory 74.2
1-Core 169
2-Core 338
102% 194 Pts
4-Core 661
8-Core 1,200
112% 930 Pts
64-Core 1,507
93% 1,507 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 565.90
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
149% Outstanding
Lighting 221
Reflection 202
Parallax 195
180% 206 fps
MRender 193
Gravity 149
Splatting 131
126% 157 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 149%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$79
350GB free
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 438 440 454 458 458 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 447
Write 435
Mixed 390
SusWrite 446
97% 429 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 84.9
4K Mixed 45.8
154% 54.7 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 284
229% 324 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 108%
Great: 125%
Kingston SA2000M8500G 500GB
273GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1472 1460 1164 1594 1334 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
275% Outstanding
Read 1,608
Write 1,684
Mixed 214
SusWrite 1,270
267% 1,194 MB/s
4K Read 61.5
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 85.7
294% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 768
DQ Write 1,122
DQ Mixed 347
430% 746 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 275%
Great: 277%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
464GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 464 468 468 466 439 299 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 452
Mixed 449
SusWrite 434
103% 459 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 56.1
192% 69.2 MB/s
DQ Read 367
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 341
256% 343 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 121%
Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
757GB free
Firmware: CC94
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 103 115 153 175 174 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 78.5
Write 139
Mixed 49.3
SusWrite 136
73% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
116% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 112%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$80
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 160 160 159 161 160 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
89% Excellent
Read 150
Write 156
Mixed 97.8
SusWrite 160
104% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.1
215% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 89%
Great: 101%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 64GB
57GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 15 11 20 23 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 63.8
Write 15.3
Mixed 11.2
SusWrite 19.1
29% 27.3 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.2
16% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX3200C16D4/8GX KHX3200C18D4/8G KHX3200C16D4/8GX KHX3200C18D4/8G 32GB
2400, 3200, 2400, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
80% Very good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 27.5
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 23.2
66% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 92.7
43% 92.7 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 80%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 200 29.5" 1280 720 KGNFFFF KAMN30FXULA
Typical Z590 Extreme WiFi 6E Builds (Compare 471 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 149%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 150%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z590 Extreme WiFi 6E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $766
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback