Today's hottest deals

HP OMEN Gaming Laptop 17-db0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics51.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP OMEN Gaming Laptop 17-db0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8C75
Memory23.2 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240502
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 28 '24 at 07:15
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 68.7
1-Core 193
2-Core 373
109% 211 Pts
4-Core 745
8-Core 1,261
122% 1,003 Pts
64-Core 1667
103% 1667 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 104%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
HP(103C 8C75) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 24.7.1
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Lighting 59.3
Reflection 35.8
Parallax 88.2
48% 61.1 fps
MRender 24.4
Gravity 74.1
Splatting 100
58% 66.2 fps
Poor: 26%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 52%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00-2006 1TB
817GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,472
Write 3,116
Mixed 2,372
664% 2,987 MB/s
4K Read 51.6
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 61.4
214% 73.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,455
DQ Write 1,497
DQ Mixed 1,366
1,057% 1,439 MB/s
Poor: 189% Great: 496%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MTC8C1084S1SC56BD1 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
138% Outstanding
MC Read 51.5
MC Write 50.7
MC Mixed 52.6
147% 51.6 GB/s
SC Read 27.1
SC Write 50.2
SC Mixed 46.9
118% 41.4 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns
Poor: 125%
This bench: 138%
Great: 180%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 240 17.2" 1707 889 CSO1701
Typical OMEN Gaming Laptop 17-db0xxx Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 121%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 128%
UFO

System: HP OMEN Gaming Laptop 17-db0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $337WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback