Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 21MA0037US

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics11.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 21MA0037US  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 21MA0037US
Memory21.5 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240430
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 28 '24 at 01:11
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core Ultra 7 155U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 14 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Memory 54
1-Core 133
2-Core 237
75% 141 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 525
54% 439 Pts
64-Core 728
45% 728 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Graphics X4 (U-iGPU)
Legend(17AA 50E1) 128MB
Driver: igd9trinity64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.5333
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Lighting 13.7
Reflection 13.4
Parallax 22.1
11% 16.4 fps
MRender 13.9
Gravity 16.6
Splatting 17.3
13% 15.9 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZAL81T0HDLB-00BLL 1TB
582GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5L2QKXD7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,674
Write 1,730
Mixed 1,594
373% 1666 MB/s
4K Read 58
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 72.9
237% 78.7 MB/s
DQ Read 682
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 525
378% 499 MB/s
Poor: 113% Great: 457%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
513GB free
Firmware: 0706
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 91.5
Write 64.2
Mixed 49.9
51% 68.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MTC8C1084S1SC56BD1 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
130% Outstanding
MC Read 48.1
MC Write 55.2
MC Mixed 52.9
149% 52.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 27.1
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 138
29% 138 ns
Poor: 131%
This bench: 130%
Great: 180%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 2 60 16" 1536 889 LEN41B5
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback