Today's hottest deals

Asus ASUS Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA_UM5606WA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics44.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
SystemAsus ASUS Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA_UM5606WA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK UM5606WA
Memory13.8 GB free of 24 GB
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240717
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 17 '24 at 04:28
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 365
FP8LPDDR5x, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 62.5
1-Core 203
2-Core 390
111% 218 Pts
4-Core 762
8-Core 1,256
123% 1,009 Pts
64-Core 1,831
113% 1,831 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 103%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 880M
Asus(1043 1DF3) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 24.10.18.08
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
44.2% Average
Lighting 48.2
Reflection 28.2
Parallax 89.2
39% 55.2 fps
MRender 26.4
Gravity 69.6
Splatting 88.6
54% 61.5 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 44%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDKBA1T0QFM-1BD1AABGB 1TB
863GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3MA101
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,603
Write 2,062
Mixed 1,487
385% 1,718 MB/s
4K Read 49.5
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 34.8
176% 63.5 MB/s
DQ Read 602
DQ Write 285
DQ Mixed 575
392% 487 MB/s
Poor: 147% Great: 323%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT62F1536M32D4DS-026 4x6GB
4 of 4 slots used
24GB 23h clocked @ 7500 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
190% Outstanding
MC Read 76.2
MC Write 67.9
MC Mixed 63.5
198% 69.2 GB/s
SC Read 44.4
SC Write 90.1
SC Mixed 62.2
187% 65.6 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 92%
This bench: 190%
Great: 199%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 54 120 16" 1280 720 SDC41AF
Typical ASUS Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA_UM5606WA Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

System: Asus ASUS Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA_UM5606WA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $300
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback