Today's hottest deals

HP Laptop 17-cn3xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics14.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Laptop 17-cn3xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8BBA
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240201
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 13 '24 at 22:04
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU 52%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
13th Gen Intel Core i5-1334U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
43.3% Average
Memory 39.3
1-Core 84.9
2-Core 171
52% 98.3 Pts
4-Core 253
8-Core 479
44% 366 Pts
64-Core 689
43% 689 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
HP(103C 8BBA) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Lighting 17.4
Reflection 21.1
Parallax 20.3
14% 19.6 fps
MRender 18
Gravity 24
Splatting 15
15% 19 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 19%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL4512HBLU 512GB
410GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS3NHAV
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 727
Write 650
Mixed 616
148% 664 MB/s
4K Read 14.6
4K Write 50.8
4K Mixed 10.3
62% 25.2 MB/s
DQ Read 427
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 313
232% 312 MB/s
Poor: 95% Great: 347%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT8GA64D88CX3S-JR 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
MC Read 34.8
MC Write 35.7
MC Mixed 33.8
99% 34.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 22.3
SC Mixed 14.1
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 229
18% 229 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 53 60 17.3" 1920 1009 AUO35AE
Typical Laptop 17-cn3xxx Builds (Compare 48 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: HP Laptop 17-cn3xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback