Today's hottest deals

HP OMEN by HP Gaming Laptop 16-xd0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics25.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Gaming Laptop 16-xd0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8BCD
Memory1.1 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240215
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 30 '24 at 21:05
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 59.2
1-Core 162
2-Core 294
90% 172 Pts
4-Core 514
8-Core 835
83% 675 Pts
64-Core 1,177
73% 1,177 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M
HP(103C 8BCD) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.40.60.05
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.2% Poor
Lighting 27.2
Reflection 14.3
Parallax 48.9
22% 30.1 fps
MRender 16.2
Gravity 38.5
Splatting 51.7
31% 35.5 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 54%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00-2006 1TB
735GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2206
Write 1,763
Mixed 1,510
405% 1,826 MB/s
4K Read 39.7
4K Write 71.6
4K Mixed 42.9
153% 51.4 MB/s
DQ Read 733
DQ Write 229
DQ Mixed 515
371% 492 MB/s
Poor: 189% Great: 473%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4PB0-CWMOL 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
104% Outstanding
MC Read 43.4
MC Write 35.2
MC Mixed 36.8
110% 38.5 GB/s
SC Read 27.4
SC Write 34.2
SC Mixed 32
89% 31.2 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 104%
This bench: 104%
Great: 149%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 165 16" 1280 720 CMN1629
Typical OMEN by HP Gaming Laptop 16-xd0xxx Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

System: HP OMEN by HP Gaming Laptop 16-xd0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $70
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback