Today's hottest deals

Alienware m16 R2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics118% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
3 months ago, 3 months ago.
SystemAlienware m16 R2  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 042JTY
Memory5.8 GB free of 16 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240604
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJul 26 '24 at 08:37
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 22 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Memory 61
1-Core 198
2-Core 384
109% 215 Pts
4-Core 665
8-Core 1,258
114% 962 Pts
64-Core 2,024
125% 2,024 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060 (Laptop)
Dell(1028 0C91) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 4025 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 560.70
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
118% Outstanding
Lighting 158
Reflection 152
Parallax 138
129% 149 fps
MRender 210
Gravity 117
Splatting 94.8
110% 141 fps
Poor: 83%
This bench: 118%
Great: 129%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme PM9A1 Samsung 1024GB
760GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 36310229 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,856
Write 3,638
Mixed 2,861
700% 3,119 MB/s
4K Read 77.7
4K Write 184
4K Mixed 107
353% 123 MB/s
DQ Read 1,240
DQ Write 930
DQ Mixed 1,055
797% 1,075 MB/s
Poor: 164% Great: 444%
WD Elements SE 2622 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 2622
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 133
Write 114
Mixed 75.1
130% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1.2
94% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMCG66AGBSA095N 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
146% Outstanding
MC Read 65.4
MC Write 53
MC Mixed 54.2
164% 57.5 GB/s
SC Read 20.3
SC Write 38.7
SC Mixed 29.9
85% 29.6 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns
Poor: 100%
This bench: 146%
Great: 146%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 240 16" 1280 720 BOE0C06 NE16NYH
Typical m16 R2 Builds (Compare 69 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 121%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

System: Alienware m16 R2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback