Today's hottest deals

Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV_FA507UV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics40.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV_FA507UV  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA507UV
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 22 '24 at 23:38
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Memory 44
1-Core 122
2-Core 209
66% 125 Pts
4-Core 406
8-Core 725
68% 566 Pts
64-Core 1,290
80% 1,290 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M Graphics
Asus(1043 3598) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.20.60.05
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
40.8% Average
Lighting 46.8
Reflection 25.7
Parallax 68.3
38% 46.9 fps
MRender 18.5
Gravity 57.6
Splatting 80.1
46% 52.1 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 54%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-512G-1102 512GB
439GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73113000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,332
Write 3,336
Mixed 2,489
680% 3,052 MB/s
4K Read 47.6
4K Write 76.5
4K Mixed 52.9
180% 59 MB/s
DQ Read 1,346
DQ Write 1,043
DQ Mixed 1,218
904% 1,202 MB/s
Poor: 215% Great: 443%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4PB0-CWMOD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
86.7% Excellent
MC Read 37.9
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 33.6
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 24
SC Write 22.8
SC Mixed 18.9
63% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 99%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 152%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 53 144 15.5" 1280 720 AUOD2A2 B156HAN15.H
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV_FA507UV Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 116%
UFO

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV_FA507UV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback