Today's hottest deals

Acer Predator PHN16-72

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics8.89% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
SystemAcer Predator PHN16-72  (all builds)
MotherboardRPL EQE_RTX
Memory7.4 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240221
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 12 '24 at 09:09
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-14500HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Memory 66.1
1-Core 108
2-Core 310
82% 161 Pts
4-Core 620
8-Core 167
63% 393 Pts
64-Core 191
12% 191 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 1731) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.5081
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
8.89% Terrible
Lighting 10
Reflection 15.3
Parallax 10.9
8% 12.1 fps
MRender 13.6
Gravity 14.1
Splatting 10.9
10% 12.9 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.89%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_3500_MTFDKBA512TGD-1BK15ABYY 512GB
248GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P8MA001 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 4,579
Write 3,994
Mixed 2,019
781% 3,530 MB/s
4K Read 56.4
4K Write 196
4K Mixed 69.2
278% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 917
DQ Write 679
DQ Mixed 807
601% 801 MB/s
Poor: 303% Great: 494%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR56S46BS6HA-8KM Adata AD5S48008G-B 16GB
5600, 4800 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
120% Outstanding
MC Read 54.8
MC Write 41.5
MC Mixed 47.3
137% 47.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 19.1
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 119%
This bench: 120%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 61 44 165 16" 1280 720 CMN1616
Typical Predator PHN16-72 Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: Acer Predator PHN16-72

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback