Today's hottest deals

HP Victus by HP Gaming Laptop 15-fa1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics10.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive86.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Victus by HP Gaming Laptop 15-fa1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8C3F
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240319
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 09 '24 at 15:21
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12450H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
47.7% Average
Memory 47.4
1-Core 76.6
2-Core 157
51% 93.6 Pts
4-Core 317
8-Core 70.2
32% 194 Pts
64-Core 86.5
5% 86.5 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 8C3F) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Lighting 11.2
Reflection 17.7
Parallax 12.8
9% 13.9 fps
MRender 15.3
Gravity 16.8
Splatting 14.1
12% 15.4 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDKBA512QFM-1BD1AABHA 512GB
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPSQ041
SusWrite @10s intervals: 845 1047 299 57 22 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Read 799
Write 812
Mixed 801
SusWrite 390
158% 701 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 45
4K Mixed 10.3
67% 25 MB/s
DQ Read 399
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 310
213% 271 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 225%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT8GA64D88CX3S-JR Crucial CB8GS3200.C8TT 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
92.3% Outstanding
MC Read 35.9
MC Write 38.3
MC Mixed 35.3
104% 36.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 17.4
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 24 3 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN1560
Typical Victus by HP Gaming Laptop 15-fa1xxx Builds (Compare 1,224 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

System: HP Victus by HP Gaming Laptop 15-fa1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback