Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemSamsung Galaxy Book4 Edge  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP960XMB-KB1US
Memory6 GB free of 16 GB
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240615
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJun 19 '24 at 18:43
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Snapdragon X Elite 84100
Qualcomm, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
71.2% Very good
Memory 71.1
1-Core 103
2-Core 190
69% 122 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 679
64% 531 Pts
64-Core 1,004
62% 1,004 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 71%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung KLUGGARHHD-B0G1 1TB
859GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0008
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 1,936
Write 2,003
Mixed 1,440
400% 1,793 MB/s
4K Read 45.3
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 69.2
221% 78.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,363
DQ Write 1,132
DQ Mixed 1,165
895% 1,220 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 6 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB TSOP 23h clocked @ 8448 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
185% Outstanding
MC Read 112
MC Write 41
MC Mixed 56.5
199% 69.7 GB/s
SC Read 73.2
SC Write 40.5
SC Mixed 43.6
150% 52.4 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 105%
This bench: 185%
Great: 192%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 52 60 0" 1920 1129
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback