Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 83EX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive207% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 83EX  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory2.4 GB free of 16 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240425
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJun 17 '24 at 20:26
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User MDV-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
75.2% Very good
Memory 64.8
1-Core 129
2-Core 237
78% 144 Pts
4-Core 458
8-Core 871
79% 664 Pts
64-Core 1,270
79% 1,270 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Legend(17AA 3D2F) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.20.24.19
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.4% Poor
Lighting 38.1
Reflection 37.3
Parallax 65.4
31% 46.9 fps
MRender 8.8
Gravity 40
Splatting 24.3
20% 24.4 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00BL2 1TB
456GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EL1QGXA7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1245 1315 1205 1398 1443 1343 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
207% Outstanding
Read 1,633
Write 1397
Mixed 1,358
SusWrite 1,325
321% 1,428 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 47.1
4K Mixed 41.4
129% 40.8 MB/s
DQ Read 703
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 550
379% 482 MB/s
Poor: 201%
This bench: 207%
Great: 458%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MTC8C1084S1SC56BD1 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.1% Good
MC Read 23.8
MC Write 23.4
MC Mixed 22.7
67% 23.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 20.9
SC Mixed 18
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 9 212 56 60 16" 1280 720 BOE0B38
Typical 83EX Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO

System: Lenovo 83EX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback