Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 82XV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive92.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 82XV  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory19.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240412
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 11 '24 at 12:38
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13420H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
58% Above average
Memory 36.8
1-Core 106
2-Core 244
64% 129 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 636
66% 530 Pts
64-Core 792
49% 792 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 58%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4050 (Laptop)
Legend(17AA 3C90) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 537.70
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
103% Outstanding
Lighting 137
Reflection 182
Parallax 120
112% 147 fps
MRender 152
Gravity 99.3
Splatting 82.4
88% 111 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 103%
Great: 112%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Solidigm SSDPFINW512GZL 512GB
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C02C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 61 356 133 75 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Read 612
Write 1,019
Mixed 848
SusWrite 127
147% 652 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 47.2
4K Mixed 29.7
123% 38.9 MB/s
DQ Read 445
DQ Write 598
DQ Mixed 115
200% 386 MB/s
Poor: 93%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 258%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G48C40S5.M8A1 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
130% Outstanding
MC Read 49.7
MC Write 58.3
MC Mixed 51
151% 53 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 26.3
SC Mixed 18.2
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 176
23% 176 ns
Poor: 113%
This bench: 130%
Great: 153%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 60 46 75 27" 1280 720 DELA1D3 DELL S2722DC
Typical 82XV Builds (Compare 1,395 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 82XV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback