AMI Intel

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive92.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAMI Intel  (all builds)
MotherboardAMI Intel
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231209
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 08 '24 at 20:51
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel N100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 0.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
58% Above average
Memory 61.8
1-Core 103
2-Core 181
64% 115 Pts
4-Core 313
8-Core 315
42% 314 Pts
64-Core 314
19% 314 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 58%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4644
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
3.37% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 6.2
Parallax 4.1
3% 4.6 fps
MRender 5.8
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 5.4
4% 5.33 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.37%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
TWSC-TN512G-SSD 512GB
421GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0714A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 394 390 400 391 397 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Read 471
Write 393
Mixed 398
SusWrite 390
93% 413 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 83.6
4K Mixed 29.5
129% 48.1 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 52.6
93% 177 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 92%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
218GB free, PID b207
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 42 42 41 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Read 40.2
Write 41
Mixed 26.2
SusWrite 41.5
50% 37.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
70% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 51%
WD My Passport Essential USB 3.0 1TB
222GB free, PID 0730
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 61 61 61 59 61 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
27.6% Poor
Read 63.8
Write 62.5
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 60.9
80% 59.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 36%
ST325031 0AS 250GB
60GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 4.9 4.9 4.8 4.7 4.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.5% Very poor
Read 65.1
Write 24
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 4.8
37% 32.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
62% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 39%
WDC WD50 00AAKX-60U6AA0 500GB
66GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 36 37 35 36 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
16.9% Very poor
Read 38.4
Write 39.3
Mixed 31.5
SusWrite 35.7
49% 36.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
71% 0.93 MB/s
TOSHIBA HDWE140 4TB
645GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.5 0.1 0.2 0.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Read 40.2
Write 41.2
Mixed 35.2
SusWrite 0.2
37% 29.2 MB/s
4K Read 7.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.1
134% 3.63 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Microelectronics Institute ZTE DDR4 NB 16G 2666 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.5% Average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 13.6
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 13
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 43 28 60 55" 1280 720 SNY3F05 SONY TV *00
Typical Intel Builds (Compare 469 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: AMI Intel

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback