Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	17% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS 159 User benchmarks, average bench 91% FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	63.8% Good	Memory 55 1-Core 152 2-Core 284 85% 163 Pts	4-Core 411 8-Core 455 57% 433 Pts	64-Core 457 28% 457 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 107%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M Graphics 201 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Legend(17AA 3815) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 24.5.1 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	17% Very poor	Lighting 19.5 Reflection 12.3 Parallax 29.1 16% 20.3 fps	MRender 12.3 Gravity 23.5 Splatting 30.6 19% 22.1 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 17% Great: 53%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFS001TEJ4X112N 1TB 615 User benchmarks, average bench 263% 796GB free (System drive) Firmware: 51040C31 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,547 Write 1937 Mixed 1,471 370% 1,652 MB/s	4K Read 42.2 4K Write 81.6 4K Mixed 30.2 146% 51.3 MB/s	DQ Read 498 DQ Write 248 DQ Mixed 479 328% 408 MB/s
Poor: 140% Great: 385%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung K3KL8L80CM-MGCT 4x4GB 83 User benchmarks, average bench 115% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 6400 MHz Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	MC Read 27.2 MC Write 41.7 MC Mixed 42.5 106% 37.1 GB/s	SC Read 30.4 SC Write 31.3 SC Mixed 35.4 92% 32.4 GB/s	Latency 134 30% 134 ns
Poor: 84% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 137%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
8%	20%	10	127	55	60	14"	1280 720	LEN88AC

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 49%

Yacht

Desktop 97%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 52%

Yacht

CPU
Ryzen 7 8845HSAMDBench 91%, 159 samples	2x

GPU
Radeon 780M GraphicsAMDBench 45%, 201 samples	2x

SSD
SKHynix_HFS512GEJ4X112N 512GBBench 197%, 254 samples	1x
SKHynix_HFS001TEJ4X112N 1TBBench 263%, 615 samples	1x

RAM
K3KL8L80CM-MGCT 4x4GBSamsungBench 115%, 83 samples	2x