Lenovo 83DJ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive143% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
SystemLenovo 83DJ  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory7.6 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 02 '24 at 22:53
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core Ultra 5 125U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 14 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Memory 43.9
1-Core 171
2-Core 331
91% 182 Pts
4-Core 351
8-Core 421
50% 386 Pts
64-Core 458
28% 458 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Graphics
Legend(17AA 3801) 1GB
Driver: igd9trinity64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.5008
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
13% Very poor
Lighting 13.7
Reflection 14.4
Parallax 19.3
11% 15.8 fps
MRender 15.7
Gravity 18.7
Splatting 24
16% 19.5 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZAL8512HDLU-00BL2 512GB
413GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5L1QKXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1117 1013 1297 828 875 359 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
143% Outstanding
Read 766
Write 963
Mixed 727
SusWrite 915
191% 843 MB/s
4K Read 36.2
4K Write 47.5
4K Mixed 42.5
134% 42.1 MB/s
DQ Read 478
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 370
263% 344 MB/s
Poor: 143%
This bench: 143%
Great: 227%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT62F1G32D2DS-026 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 7467 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
120% Outstanding
MC Read 42.3
MC Write 54.8
MC Mixed 45.3
136% 47.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 32.4
SC Mixed 24.7
70% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 225
18% 225 ns
Poor: 115%
This bench: 120%
Great: 166%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 21 0 60 14" 1280 720 LEN8885
Typical 83DJ Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 83DJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback