Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 183%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 232%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 114%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics161% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive526% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory54.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231013
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 01 '24 at 23:15
Run Duration271 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D-$475
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Memory 73.9
1-Core 213
2-Core 421
121% 236 Pts
4-Core 827
8-Core 1,513
140% 1,170 Pts
64-Core 3,482
216% 3,482 Pts
Poor: 114%
This bench: 114%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-$520
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 555.85
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
161% Outstanding
Lighting 223
Reflection 208
Parallax 244
181% 225 fps
MRender 283
Gravity 196
Splatting 153
166% 211 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 161%
Great: 205%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 2TB-$144
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4533 4525 4523 4528 4532 1448 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
526% Outstanding
Read 2,029
Write 4644
Mixed 3,388
SusWrite 4,015
804% 3,519 MB/s
4K Read 86.2
4K Write 246
4K Mixed 129
426% 154 MB/s
DQ Read 1,716
DQ Write 1,300
DQ Mixed 1,484
1,116% 1,500 MB/s
Poor: 286%
This bench: 526%
Great: 587%
WD Blue SN580 1TB
930GB free
Firmware: 281010WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1364 1354 1350 1348 1348 1349 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
306% Outstanding
Read 1,368
Write 1,370
Mixed 1244
SusWrite 1,352
301% 1,333 MB/s
4K Read 75.4
4K Write 187
4K Mixed 92.5
332% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 1,540
DQ Write 1453
DQ Mixed 1,803
1,269% 1,599 MB/s
Poor: 280%
This bench: 306%
Great: 598%
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 2TB-$144
332GB free
Firmware: 0B2QJXG7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4057 2248 1149 1136 1194 1189 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
389% Outstanding
Read 2,055
Write 4,163
Mixed 3,206
SusWrite 1,829
640% 2,814 MB/s
4K Read 84.4
4K Write 223
4K Mixed 123
404% 144 MB/s
DQ Read 1,752
DQ Write 1,354
DQ Mixed 1,522
1,147% 1,543 MB/s
Poor: 286%
This bench: 389%
Great: 587%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5 6000 C36 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
177% Outstanding
MC Read 87.2
MC Write 50.7
MC Mixed 60.2
189% 66 GB/s
SC Read 40.7
SC Write 66.2
SC Mixed 50.7
150% 52.5 GB/s
Latency 93.6
43% 93.6 ns
Poor: 122%
This bench: 177%
Great: 201%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 144 34" 1280 720 MSI3DB6 MSI MAG342CQR
Typical TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 362 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 414%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 422%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $2,095
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback