Today's hottest deals

Acer Swift SFE16-42

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics26.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Swift SFE16-42  (all builds)
MotherboardRB Globefish_RBU
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB
Display3840 x 2400 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231004
Uptime11.3 Days
Run DateJun 01 '24 at 00:41
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User VEN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7735U
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
42.3% Average
Memory 36.2
1-Core 79.4
2-Core 160
48% 91.9 Pts
4-Core 259
8-Core 486
44% 372 Pts
64-Core 843
52% 843 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Acer(1025 1635) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.32.03
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.9% Poor
Lighting 31.4
Reflection 47.5
Parallax 59.6
26% 46.2 fps
MRender 21.4
Gravity 35
Splatting 46.1
29% 34.2 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_3400_MTFDKBA1T0TFH 1TB
899GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P7MA000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2314
Write 2,147
Mixed 1,891
472% 2,117 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 67.5
4K Mixed 45.1
155% 51 MB/s
DQ Read 599
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 511
367% 478 MB/s
Poor: 234% Great: 521%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9JCNNNCP3MLYR-N6E 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB 23h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
87.1% Excellent
MC Read 32
MC Write 34.8
MC Mixed 31.8
94% 32.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 33
SC Mixed 24.1
70% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 222
18% 222 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 16" 1280 720 SDC416B
Typical Swift SFE16-42 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Acer Swift SFE16-42

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback