Alienware m16 R1 AMD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 232%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 270%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 113%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics211% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive871% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAlienware m16 R1 AMD  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0YT34N
Memory52.6 GB free of 64 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240423
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 29 '24 at 09:06
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
FL1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Memory 78.4
1-Core 200
2-Core 403
117% 227 Pts
4-Core 785
8-Core 1,464
134% 1,124 Pts
64-Core 2,638
163% 2,638 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 113%
Great: 113%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080 (Laptop)
Dell(1028 0BFE) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 4525 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 555.85
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
211% Outstanding
Lighting 302
Reflection 282
Parallax 304
246% 296 fps
MRender 425
Gravity 244
Splatting 190
223% 286 fps
Poor: 130%
This bench: 211%
Great: 218%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 8TB
7TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8930 10583 12148 9956 9908 10557 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
871% Outstanding
Read 2,161
Write 10,140
Mixed 3,405
SusWrite 10347
1,498% 6,513 MB/s
4K Read 55.1
4K Write 225
4K Mixed 88.9
317% 123 MB/s
DQ Read 1,363
DQ Write 1145
DQ Mixed 1,262
943% 1,257 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 871%
Great: 785%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT32G52C42S5.M16G1 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
153% Outstanding
MC Read 64
MC Write 52.2
MC Mixed 49.9
158% 55.4 GB/s
SC Read 48
SC Write 59.8
SC Mixed 48.2
149% 52 GB/s
Latency 89.2
45% 89.2 ns
Poor: 111%
This bench: 153%
Great: 173%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 58: 0P 5R 10G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
58% 21% 84 217 58 240 16" 1707 1067 BOE0B04
Typical m16 R1 AMD Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Alienware m16 R1 AMD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $164
Intel Core i5-12400F $117Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $393
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback