Today's hottest deals

Standard Standard

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 132%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 145%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics148% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive266% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemStandard Standard  (all builds)
MotherboardStandard Standard
Memory24.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240327
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMay 23 '24 at 11:02
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Memory 73.9
1-Core 179
2-Core 332
103% 195 Pts
4-Core 543
8-Core 1,071
95% 807 Pts
64-Core 1719
106% 1719 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070 (Laptop)
Device(1D05 1395) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 555.85
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
148% Outstanding
Lighting 199
Reflection 188
Parallax 210
162% 199 fps
MRender 302
Gravity 179
Splatting 126
157% 202 fps
Poor: 94%
This bench: 148%
Great: 152%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mushkin MKNSSDVT512GB-D8 512GB
296GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.H.J.G5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1330 1521 1587 1660 1694 943 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
266% Outstanding
Read 2,197
Write 1,689
Mixed 1,472
SusWrite 1,456
382% 1,703 MB/s
4K Read 40.4
4K Write 81.9
4K Mixed 53.6
173% 58.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,262
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 882
626% 822 MB/s
Poor: 187%
This bench: 266%
Great: 422%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown MRA5S480FFFD16G 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
148% Outstanding
MC Read 52.8
MC Write 56.6
MC Mixed 48.6
150% 52.7 GB/s
SC Read 51
SC Write 61.3
SC Mixed 51.3
156% 54.5 GB/s
Latency 93.6
43% 93.6 ns
Poor: 100%
This bench: 148%
Great: 148%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 38 5 240 16" 2560 1369 BOE0B87
Typical Standard Builds (Compare 681 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Standard Standard

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 141% - Outstanding Total price: $75
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback