Today's hottest deals

HP Pavilion All-in-One Desktop 27-ca2xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.82% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive203% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Pavilion All-in-One Desktop 27-ca2xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8ACF
Memory6.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231003
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateMay 10 '24 at 20:24
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User VCT-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
13th Gen Intel Core i7-13700T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 68.6
1-Core 148
2-Core 259
86% 158 Pts
4-Core 425
8-Core 619
65% 522 Pts
64-Core 986
61% 986 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 116%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 770
HP(103C 8ACF) 128MB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.5334
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
6.82% Terrible
Lighting 7.5
Reflection 12.5
Parallax 6.9
6% 8.97 fps
MRender 10.4
Gravity 11.5
Splatting 8.7
8% 10.2 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.82%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg50znv1t02 KIOXIA 1TB
847GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP02AN00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1183 1241 1232 1037 586 583 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
203% Outstanding
Read 1662
Write 1,370
Mixed 1324
SusWrite 977
299% 1,333 MB/s
4K Read 46.1
4K Write 82.3
4K Mixed 55.4
184% 61.3 MB/s
DQ Read 613
DQ Write 253
DQ Mixed 475
341% 447 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 203%
Great: 336%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA2GS6CJR8N-XN 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
42% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 13.2
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 11.9
34% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 58 32 60 27.6" 1920 1009 HPN404C HP Contino
Typical Pavilion All-in-One Desktop 27-ca2xxx Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: HP Pavilion All-in-One Desktop 27-ca2xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $70
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback