Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics152% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory15.6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 15.6GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory10.3 GB free of 15.625 GB @ 0 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20240311
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 10 '24 at 00:26
Run Duration101 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 51%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Core i7-10700K
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
44.4% Average
Memory 51.1
1-Core 106
2-Core 217
66% 125 Pts
4-Core 217
8-Core 230
30% 223 Pts
64-Core 227
14% 227 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$700
EVGA(3842 4897) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
152% Outstanding
Lighting 194
Reflection 234
Parallax 269
158% 232 fps
MRender 297
Gravity 226
Splatting 158
178% 227 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 152%
Great: 202%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 107GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,656
Write 1,675
Mixed 1,348
1,168% 1,560 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 18.9
4K Mixed 36
5,704% 29.1 MB/s
DQ Read 87.3
DQ Write 79.1
DQ Mixed 79.1
738% 81.8 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x15GB
1 of 1 slots used
15GB DIMM RAM
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
54.4% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 20.6
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 14.8
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 151%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 29 5 120 34.8" 3440 1377 SAM72F2 Odyssey G85SB
Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 622 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback