Today's hottest deals

HP Laptop 15-ef2xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.02% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive151% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Laptop 15-ef2xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 887A
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230802
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateApr 27 '24 at 02:14
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User ECU-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 60.7
1-Core 81.1
2-Core 138
54% 93.3 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 588
58% 473 Pts
64-Core 889
55% 889 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
HP(103C 887A) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.30.44
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
9.02% Terrible
Lighting 8.5
Reflection 13.7
Parallax 21.3
7% 14.5 fps
MRender 12.1
Gravity 16.9
Splatting 17.9
13% 15.6 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.02%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PSEJN512GA87EC0 512GB
410GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPE36P01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 906 823 888 1053 1074 1066 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
151% Outstanding
Read 964
Write 1,122
Mixed 966
SusWrite 968
227% 1,005 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 44.9
4K Mixed 33.5
109% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 615
DQ Write 277
DQ Mixed 485
349% 459 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 151%
Great: 253%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44CB0-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 18
52% 18 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 22.5
SC Mixed 17.1
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 55 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN1542
Typical Laptop 15-ef2xxx Builds (Compare 620 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15-ef2xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback