Today's hottest deals

Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HF_FX506HF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive511% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HF_FX506HF  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX506HF
Memory1.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240311
Uptime13.8 Days
Run DateApr 24 '24 at 08:51
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Memory 68.8
1-Core 151
2-Core 286
90% 169 Pts
4-Core 527
8-Core 872
85% 700 Pts
64-Core 1,065
66% 1,065 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 3088) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
4.57% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 10.2
Parallax 6.2
4% 7.27 fps
MRender 8.7
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 4
5% 6.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.57%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00-1002 1TB
776GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 74104000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3126 3112 3096 3011 3074 3051 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
511% Outstanding
Read 4,119
Write 2,994
Mixed 2,252
SusWrite 3,078
696% 3,111 MB/s
4K Read 66.5
4K Write 224
4K Mixed 87.6
332% 126 MB/s
DQ Read 1,427
DQ Write 1,111
DQ Mixed 1,228
930% 1,256 MB/s
Poor: 182%
This bench: 511%
Great: 511%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
46.4% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 13.9
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 13.9
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 72 15.5" 1280 720 NCP004D
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HF_FX506HF Builds (Compare 967 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HF_FX506HF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback