Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 114%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive	324% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	28.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20240322
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 17 '24 at 13:17
Run Duration	206 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$245 60,132 User benchmarks, average bench 99% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	114% Outstanding	Memory 95.3 1-Core 183 2-Core 360 114% 213 Pts	4-Core 709 8-Core 1,316 121% 1,013 Pts	64-Core 2,396 148% 2,396 Pts
Poor: 87% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 108%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS3140 2TB SSD 467 User benchmarks, average bench 445% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: CS314211 SusWrite @10s intervals: 2009 1784 1776 1779 1778 1772 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	324% Outstanding	Read 1,616 Write 1,771 Mixed 1,176 SusWrite 1,816 360% 1595 MB/s	4K Read 49.1 4K Write 242 4K Mixed 73.1 296% 122 MB/s	DQ Read 1,533 DQ Write 1082 DQ Mixed 1,248 948% 1,288 MB/s
Poor: 246% ↑ This bench: 324% Great: 596%
PNY CS3030 1TB SSD 12,276 User benchmarks, average bench 228% 569GB free Firmware: CS303321 SusWrite @10s intervals: 2155 1034 1025 1029 1042 1031 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	295% Outstanding	Read 1,667 Write 2,001 Mixed 1,813 SusWrite 1,219 378% 1,675 MB/s	4K Read 51.9 4K Write 188 4K Mixed 79.2 280% 106 MB/s	DQ Read 1,730 DQ Write 1,311 DQ Mixed 1,448 1,103% 1,497 MB/s
Poor: 157% ↑ This bench: 295% Great: 286%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82 64,359 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 123 124 123 122 121 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	64.2% Good	Read 101 Write 102 Mixed 62 SusWrite 122 71% 96.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.9 182% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D30AESBK.M8FE BL8G32C16U4B.8FE BLS8G4D30AESBK.M8FE BL8G32C16U4B.8FE 32GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 3600, 3600, 3600, 3600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	134% Outstanding	MC Read 61.6 MC Write 45.1 MC Mixed 44.2 144% 50.3 GB/s	SC Read 32.3 SC Write 26.8 SC Mixed 41.1 95% 33.4 GB/s	Latency 56.9 70% 56.9 ns
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 134% Great: 134%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	64	47	60	0"	1280 720

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,848 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $200

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	1,308x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $115Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	873x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $175Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	835x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	571x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	517x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	406x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	341x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	273x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	265x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	242x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	142x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	141x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $1,045

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16