Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 164%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 157%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics156% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive292% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory54.8 GB free of 64 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit 种颜色,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230728
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 13 '24 at 07:07
Run Duration304 Seconds
Run User CHN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7600-$199
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 80.2
1-Core 193
2-Core 380
114% 218 Pts
4-Core 703
8-Core 1,076
110% 890 Pts
64-Core 1,384
86% 1,384 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 106%
Great: 116%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$495
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.76
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
156% Outstanding
Lighting 231
Reflection 216
Parallax 207
188% 218 fps
MRender 203
Gravity 157
Splatting 139
133% 166 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 156%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT2000T500SSD5 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: P8CR002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4580 4677 4755 4772 4788 4788 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
685% Outstanding
Read 4,500
Write 4,998
Mixed 3028
SusWrite 4,727
973% 4,313 MB/s
4K Read 84.6
4K Write 279
4K Mixed 124
435% 162 MB/s
DQ Read 1,986
DQ Write 1,698
DQ Mixed 1,858
1,388% 1,848 MB/s
Poor: 232%
This bench: 685%
Great: 685%
CT2000T500SSD8 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: P8CR002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4043 4042 4062 4046 4043 4043 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
616% Outstanding
Read 4,106
Write 4,180
Mixed 2,928
SusWrite 4,046
860% 3,815 MB/s
4K Read 81
4K Write 237
4K Mixed 116
397% 145 MB/s
DQ Read 1,982
DQ Write 1,690
DQ Mixed 1,838
1,377% 1,837 MB/s
Poor: 252%
This bench: 616%
Great: 682%
Solidigm SSDPFKNU020TZ 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1351 1349 1363 1380 1383 1381 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
292% Outstanding
Read 1318
Write 1,405
Mixed 1,196
SusWrite 1,368
298% 1,322 MB/s
4K Read 72
4K Write 205
4K Mixed 97.5
343% 125 MB/s
DQ Read 1,242
DQ Write 1,001
DQ Mixed 915
741% 1,053 MB/s
Poor: 187%
This bench: 292%
Great: 452%
Intel 540s Series 120GB
102GB free
Firmware: LSF031C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 66 66 66 66 66 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Read 492
Write 374
Mixed 412
SusWrite 75.9
76% 338 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 48.7
164% 60.2 MB/s
DQ Read 264
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 209
162% 222 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 84%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$80
1.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 159 160 158 161 158 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 166
Mixed 74
SusWrite 159
103% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G56C46U5.M8G1 CP16G56C46U5.M8G1 CT16G56C46U5.M8G1 CP16G56C46U5.M8G1 64GB
5600, 5600, 5600, 5600 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
170% Outstanding
MC Read 60.2
MC Write 61.5
MC Mixed 61.4
174% 61 GB/s
SC Read 56.2
SC Write 66.6
SC Mixed 57.4
172% 60.1 GB/s
Latency 80.7
50% 80.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 39: 0P 3R 5G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 45 11 60 27" 2560 1369 SAM7081 SAMSUNG
Typical TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 365 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 413%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 420%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $2,095
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback