Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-B760 AORUS ELITE DDR4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 119%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics206% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B760 AORUS ELITE DDR4  (all builds)
Memory22.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230724
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 10 '24 at 23:55
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-14600KF-$190
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 5.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Memory 76.3
1-Core 221
2-Core 442
126% 246 Pts
4-Core 861
8-Core 1,486
142% 1,174 Pts
64-Core 2,637
163% 2,637 Pts
Poor: 119%
This bench: 119%
Great: 129%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-$500
Nvidia(10DE 1800) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 531.61
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
206% Outstanding
Lighting 300
Reflection 273
Parallax 289
244% 287 fps
MRender 365
Gravity 246
Splatting 192
210% 268 fps
Poor: 161%
This bench: 206%
Great: 204%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S1000G 1TB
882GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBM02103
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,992
Write 2,293
Mixed 1,518
432% 1,935 MB/s
4K Read 51.4
4K Write 307
4K Mixed 48.1
302% 135 MB/s
DQ Read 779
DQ Write 1,597
DQ Mixed 615
631% 997 MB/s
Poor: 150% Great: 352%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB
9GB free, PID 5595
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 137
Write 10.7
Mixed 24.4
49% 57.5 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1.8
138% 3.4 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMG32GX4M2D3600C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
119% Outstanding
MC Read 47
MC Write 45.1
MC Mixed 42
128% 44.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 45.7
SC Mixed 28.6
90% 31.3 GB/s
Latency 88.2
45% 88.2 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 119%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 52: 0P 5R 8G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
52% 57% 28 215 57 60 27" 2560 1440 WAM2700 MGN-004-27S
Typical GA-B760 AORUS ELITE DDR4 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 338%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 119%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 370%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B760 AORUS ELITE DDR4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $1,203
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback