Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-14J1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.66% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive98.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star Modern 14 C12MO
MotherboardMSI MS-14J1  (all builds)
Memory0.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230926
Uptime47.3 Days
Run DateApr 06 '24 at 22:31
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User SAU-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1215U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
47.7% Average
Memory 56.5
1-Core 103
2-Core 156
60% 105 Pts
4-Core 212
8-Core 296
32% 254 Pts
64-Core 372
23% 372 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
MSI(1462 134E) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4314
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
5.66% Terrible
Lighting 7.7
Reflection 12.5
Parallax 10.4
6% 10.2 fps
MRender 11.4
Gravity 7
Splatting 0.4
4% 6.27 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 5.66%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Phison 256GB ESR256GTLCW-E9C-2MS
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EJFM61.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 362 142 195 191 157 126 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
98.3% Outstanding
Read 379
Write 1,065
Mixed 985
SusWrite 196
150% 656 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 48
153% 60.1 MB/s
DQ Read 655
DQ Write 386
DQ Mixed 477
367% 506 MB/s
Poor: 98%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-3G2R1 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
74.4% Very good
MC Read 26
MC Write 29.7
MC Mixed 27.6
79% 27.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 29.7
SC Mixed 17.5
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 139
29% 139 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 51 22 60 13.9" 1280 720 CMN142B
Typical MS-14J1 Builds (Compare 143 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-14J1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback