Today's hottest deals

Acer Predator PO3-650

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 114%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Predator PO3-650  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Predator PO3-650
Memory21.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230105
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 06 '24 at 02:31
Run Duration80 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700F-$304
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Memory 71
1-Core 211
2-Core 426
120% 236 Pts
4-Core 839
8-Core 1,501
141% 1,170 Pts
64-Core 2,660
165% 2,660 Pts
Poor: 116%
This bench: 114%
Great: 125%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-$500
Acer(1025 A714) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 551.83
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
124% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 252
Parallax 306
96% 225 fps
MRender 342
Gravity 230
Splatting 181
197% 251 fps
Poor: 161%
This bench: 124%
Great: 204%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_3400_MTFDKBA1T0TFH 1TB
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P7MA000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,802
Write 3,809
Mixed 2,599
758% 3,403 MB/s
4K Read 59.8
4K Write 203
4K Mixed 90.1
314% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 1,477
DQ Write 1,265
DQ Mixed 1,383
1,033% 1,375 MB/s
Poor: 196% Great: 540%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX5M2B6400C32 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 4400 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
136% Outstanding
MC Read 55.7
MC Write 51.8
MC Mixed 50.5
150% 52.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 47.9
SC Mixed 26.4
88% 30.8 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 136%
This bench: 136%
Great: 214%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 120 32" 1280 720 MSI3DC7 MSI MAG323UPF
Typical Predator PO3-650 Builds (Compare 289 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 224%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 119%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 259%
UFO

System: Acer Predator PO3-650

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $804
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback