Asrock H610M-H2/M.2 D5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics155% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsrock H610M-H2/M.2 D5  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock H610M-H2/M.2 D5
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230714
Uptime7.6 Days
Run DateApr 05 '24 at 15:44
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-14100F-$112
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Memory 71.4
1-Core 181
2-Core 344
104% 199 Pts
4-Core 592
8-Core 897
92% 744 Pts
64-Core 892
55% 892 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$385
Palit(1569 F314) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
155% Outstanding
Lighting 218
Reflection 196
Parallax 215
178% 210 fps
MRender 299
Gravity 165
Splatting 125
152% 197 fps
Poor: 126%
This bench: 155%
Great: 157%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S1000G 1TB
751GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBM02103
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,587
Write 1,099
Mixed 1,062
277% 1249 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 191
4K Mixed 33.9
196% 86.2 MB/s
DQ Read 784
DQ Write 1,012
DQ Mixed 571
522% 789 MB/s
Poor: 150% Great: 352%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
931GB free
Firmware: CC46
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 158
Write 151
Mixed 70.1
93% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
180% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AD5U480016G-B 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
83.2% Excellent
MC Read 32.1
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 28.7
88% 30.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 21.9
67% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 2 205 49 170 23.8" 1920 1057 MSI9BA4 MSI G2412
Typical H610M-H2/M.2 D5 Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 115%
UFO

System: Asrock H610M-H2/M.2 D5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $403
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback