Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-B760M GAMING X AX DDR4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 262%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 113%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 342%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 113%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics242% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive521% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B760M GAMING X AX DDR4  (all builds)
Memory19 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231214
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 05 '24 at 10:08
Run Duration241 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-14700F-$325
U3E1, 1 CPU, 20 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Memory 68.8
1-Core 216
2-Core 435
121% 240 Pts
4-Core 840
8-Core 1,581
144% 1,210 Pts
64-Core 3,551
220% 3,551 Pts
Poor: 105%
This bench: 113%
Great: 127%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$749
Gigabyte(1458 40EC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.12
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
242% Outstanding
Lighting 349
Reflection 346
Parallax 372
284% 356 fps
MRender 488
Gravity 302
Splatting 218
261% 336 fps
Poor: 208%
This bench: 242%
Great: 256%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team TM8FPK001T 1TB
865GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVN11778
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3914 3897 3743 1900 1881 1866 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
521% Outstanding
Read 3658
Write 4,104
Mixed 2,683
SusWrite 2,867
749% 3,328 MB/s
4K Read 73.7
4K Write 279
4K Mixed 114
406% 156 MB/s
DQ Read 1,906
DQ Write 1,458
DQ Mixed 1,707
1,270% 1,690 MB/s
Poor: 240%
This bench: 521%
Great: 521%
Seagate One Touch w/PW 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 1707
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 46.9
Write 99
Mixed 83.3
58% 76.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.8
199% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 69%
WD Elements 25A3 18TB
9TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 79
Write 183
Mixed 74.6
156% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 7.5
4K Mixed 1.2
298% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 111%
WD Elements 25A1 3TB
562GB free, PID 25a1
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 49.6
Write 1.7
Mixed 2
13% 17.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Mixed 0
2% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMG32GX4M2E3200C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
64.9% Good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 23.3
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 18.8
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 101
39% 101 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 27" 1280 720 AOC2702 Q27G2SG4B+
Typical GA-B760M GAMING X AX DDR4 Builds (Compare 631 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B760M GAMING X AX DDR4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $368
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $376WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $253Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback