Lenovo 82X3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics36% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 82X3  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory7.7 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240117
Uptime2 Days
Run DateMar 24 '24 at 20:34
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U 780M Graphics
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Memory 25.5
1-Core 146
2-Core 247
70% 139 Pts
4-Core 465
8-Core 829
78% 647 Pts
64-Core 1,255
78% 1,255 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M
Legend(17AA 382D) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 23.20.28.04
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
36% Below average
Lighting 43.4
Reflection 23.2
Parallax 48.7
35% 38.4 fps
MRender 12.8
Gravity 47.9
Splatting 65.1
37% 41.9 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 36%
Great: 53%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron MTFDKCD1T0TFK 1TB
877GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1004V5LN
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,074
Write 1,492
Mixed 995
266% 1,187 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 47.9
4K Mixed 33.8
114% 37.2 MB/s
DQ Read 506
DQ Write 243
DQ Mixed 606
388% 452 MB/s
Poor: 105% Great: 335%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT62F1G32D4DR-031 WT 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
MC Read 33.3
MC Write 39.7
MC Mixed 36.4
104% 36.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 35.6
SC Mixed 35.8
84% 29.4 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 48 15 60 14" 1280 729 LEN88AC
Typical 82X3 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 82X3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback